Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
As a LilNouner, I agree with those mentioned whales this time and believe that we should fork! Nouns often underestimate the value of subDAOs, ignoring them and undermining them.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Davin クマ
@davinoyesigye
what’s the difference between a subDAO and a fork? 🤔
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
The forks are built toward minority protection, while subDAOs are made towards decentralization, which Nouns prove they are not after. 🤷♂️
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Davin クマ
@davinoyesigye
nouns as an ethereum art project has always pursued decentralization to the max!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
Maybe they say that, or perhaps they even wanted that at some point, but actions are not saying that. If we look back, they did that repeatedly during past years by competing with subDAOs instead of collaborating.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Davin クマ
@davinoyesigye
FAQ: who is they?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
The collective, the majority of Nouns token holders. Which we can call them as a whole.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
would be curious which props made you feel we're "competing with subDAOs instead of collaborating"! (not saying you're wrong, mostly looking to understand)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
We were aligned; we were supposed to create a graduation pathway, and we built it. But we can't compete with Nouns grants, we can't compete with Nouns rounds of Prop House, and we definitely can't compete with Candidates built to kill subDAO initiatives, and a lot more.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
