Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
This feels pretty gatekeeperish rather than nounish imo especially since the original artist wasn’t consulted. Up vote or down vote the prop. But it shouldn’t just be only select artists allowed to propose new traits and be the deciders. Same vibe with the bowl cut.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
i don’t quite understand the view that the community artists we trust shouldn’t opine on new trait proposals. surely if someone put up a prop to add code to our smart contracts we would be interested to hear from the verbs team if they think it’s high quality and fits with the rest of the code base?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
ultimately voters decide whatever they decide but but i always WANT domain experts to opine rather than not
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
They can opine away but what I’m taking issue with is the redesign without the original artist asking for it. That feels like gatekeeping & saying that only those who’ve had traits accepted previously should submit unless given approval. And I agree —it should just go to a vote. titw
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Also — we need more creativity & more traits being added more often to bring renewed energy to the auctions. /yellow auctions are so much more fun right now due to the newness of the art. Need the same for /nouns
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction