Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Elad
@el4d
It seems inevitable for nouns to one day have a more formal way of saying "you're a citizen of noun world" And it will NOT be owning a Noun, as we slowly grow the world and the DAO is no longer synonymous with the movement (it already isn't, but the diff isn't huge yet). I'm applying for citizenship in advance!
5 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
somehow I find myself resisting the “networked state” definition so hard
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Elad
@el4d
Say more please
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
the obsession around owning territory feels backwards to me. like as if it doesn’t believe a digital world can be real enough to matter.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Elad
@el4d
Ah ok, I also care less about territory. I like the state analogy for the richness it has to offer: it has holidays and rituals, it has many cultures and a unifying culture, it has government and business and art etc..
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
yeah “state” is good. but “network state” balaji has made it into a defined term and the term has so much of an obsession around territory. well, just looked up and the definition of “state” itself has territory meanings in it as well.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
maybe “onchain state” or “meme state”. the territory we occupy is not meatspace land but onchain land or meme land.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Elad
@el4d
We do have some kinds of boundaries that separate being in Nouns vs out But they don't have to be in physics space
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
