Science

Quantum mechanics has this extreme intellectual sheen, and disagreeing with the orthodoxy is a surefire way to self-recategorize as a crank. The layers of lindy thinking accumulate into unquestionable dried crusts that seminarians are instructed to accept on faith so they can join the church of shut up and calculate.

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

Have I asked you, how do you like Carlo Rovelli and loop gravity

@backpack put a bank in your pocket and use your money whenever, wherever, however without permission

/backpack
/notdevin
icebreaker.xyz/notdevin

as usual, the wikipedia is so technical as to be useless

Yeah I just like his books and his writing style in general

The order of time is my favorite and really clarifying for me on quantum concepts in general

I'll check it out, this was an interesting read:

The boundaries he describes are vivid and accessible to me, which I appreciate given the history of quantum and its inaccessibility in its descriptions. The finite boundaries and sizing of infinity I like a lot as well 

(Not that at any of that matters to the validity of a theory or anything)

I'll check it out, this was an interesting read: 
https://academics.hamilton.edu/physics/smajor/Papers/rovelli03.pdf