cars

Touchscreen interfaces in cars are much worse UX than physical buttons

Catch me on X, notifications are off here 
@devinjelliot

Bias Research Ltd. • Druglord 
De-di-designer, autodidact. 🗿 UX AI/ML  • Channeling @punk • 
punk.energy 🫧 /punk • dont let your /antimeme ‘s stay dreams

Totally agree. I’ve yet to see a touchscreen well designed such that at rivals a clean layout of switches, toggles, and buttons. I need less cognitive load while driving, not more

Touchscreens aren’t so bad when the interactions aren’t nested, problem is for some reason most of the interaction designs are nested interactions cuz most designers are trash

Into innovation and biology as a technology - probably gonna talk about biomimicry

😂 

I take zero car advice from you and your Suzuki

Agreed. Seems like adding voice control is an attempt to smooth that out, but it's way too slow and janky in any new car I've tried it in, including my own. The knob in BMW is not bad, but also not great.

100%

I drive an F-150 Lightning, and I would have paid *extra* for the model without the massive touchscreen.

Luckily, it was cheaper.

30 physical buttons is *so* much better than 1 massive screen, it's amazing how far the marketing has drifted from the value.

agreed
mazda refused to incorporate touch for so long. but even they gave in. 
the knob is the way