If you want real customers and you would use your product, then just be yourself on the call. If you swear, swear, if you’re polite, be polite, if you wear suits, wear a suit, just be you. 

If you’re not you, and you get the sale, the customer sucks, you bought them, or the product sells itself in which case, good job. The other two are going to zero

@backpack put a bank in your pocket and use your money whenever, wherever, however without permission

/backpack
/notdevin
icebreaker.xyz/notdevin

Uniqueness, Originality and authenticity still the biggest leverage a company or a product can have 

I still don’t get why many start ups want to copy or duplicate pass great works

Art enthusiast, passionate about mental growth, and an ever-learning individual

I don’t think people want to, I think they do it as a reflex to the ambiguity they don’t yet know how to answer.

Generally the ambiguity is who wants your product or what problem are you solving for? The arm chair QBs say this as if doing so is equivalent to knowing the answer. The answer is only easily knowable if you’re building an already know thing. I’m selling chairs, we know people will sit and pay to sit, therefore most ambiguity is extracted from this scenario, you need only describe why sitting in your chair is better. 

On the other hand new product, market, etc, much more ambiguity. Okay we know this, but the point shows up in the journey of discovering your market, thus the stages of growth outlined by VC once upon a time. People are copying and regurgitating things in startups because it’s easy to reach and it claims to answer some of the ambiguity. It mostly doesn’t but with enough marketing dollars and fancy resumes ambiguity can be finger pointed away, that’s the mislead of it.

Nice view, but what could this ambiguity be, ambiguity on what to create, on how to stand out, or on sustainability?