chill_vibes_jamie
@nordioz43
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lets talk about BIG ROLLUP
One thing I haven't heard anyone mention with L1 blob fee debate is the fee share given to BIG ROLLUP, ie OP superchain, zksync elastic chain, arb orbit etc
Superchain is the largest, and has made 7.4k eth last year => ~$24.4M, and ~$49.9M over its lifetime
Whats interesting is BIG ROLLUP gets top-line fees (ie straight from gas costs on the L2), vs ETH L1 getting bottom-line fees from blob price
There's a dilemma for L1: increase blob fees and risk losing rollups (especially smaller ones) to other DA solutions. Reduce blob fees further and lose value accrual to the token
If rollups need blob scaling and reduced fees, bribing ETH holders with some of this revenue would do well for their cause
Direct a portion of BIG ROLLUP revs to either a burn, or better yet, borrow USD and do massive TWAPs ala saylor
The fact is that L2 fees *are* extracting more than they are giving back currently, but they have the power to turn this around
wyt 1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
