@danfinlay can you tell me about the scalable social dynamics you imagined? Is this what you were telling me about on our walk?

co founder of @metamask . Making computers behave for us.

@danfinlay can you tell me about the scalable social dynamics you imagined? Is this what you were telling me about on our walk?

https://medium.com/capabul?ref=blog.danfinlay.com

That blog has a lot on it, said a lot of different ways, but maybe it needs a freshen up. If I were to remaster that blog, I would rewrite "Trust mapping social arrangements" with more meticulous examples of practical financial cycles, and draw it to how it could create insurance/liquidity for a variety of real issues today: Insuring an online purchase, creating private invite graphs for accessing sensitive opportunities/medicines.

I took a stab to recently re-articulate some of it here:

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

That blog has a lot on it, said a lot of different ways, but maybe it needs a freshen up. If I were to remaster that blog, I would rewrite "Trust mapping social arrangements" with more meticulous examples of practical financial cycles, and draw it to how it could create insurance/liquidity for a variety of real issues today: Insuring an online purchase, creating private invite graphs for accessing sensitive opportunities/medicines.

I took a stab to recently re-articulate some of it here:
https://blog.danfinlay.com/protocol-seeking-protocol/

Reduction, revocation, recommendation is a fire ontology

ontology polyamory is a good sign of nondogmatism though

Maybe I should use that more. I sometimes feel like I just keep producing different models to describe, and never decide one is particularly good and just keep moving, hoping one sticks.