is it awkward that garry tan doesn't fit in around here?
article mischaracterizes the opponent, language intends to be inflammatory rather than explanatory, he just cross posts doesn't actually engage in discussion

it's weird twitterbrain sewage leaking into our garden

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

I'm pro growth, but if this is what anti-degrowth team's epistemics look like I'm happy to reconsider. enough hyperbolic rhetoric and mudslinging. it's debasing to a builder of this caliber

final thing: I wouldn't recast + dunk if there was an actual conversation to be had, but I haven't actually seen Gary reply to comments here, so I think we're just getting his crossposts (or maybe his social media team's crossposts)