Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
brian is live on unlonely pfp
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
there’s a clear lack of conversation around the channels stuff on farcaster. echo chambers are bad and we do a disservice to farcaster long term if we: - always agree 100% with what @dwr.eth says and does / dont hold people accountable - are afraid to speak out about things, specifically the larger accounts here
29 replies
2 recasts
40 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Nobody is afraid of Dan's retribution lol it's just a nothingburger - 1 of ? 3 relevant things: 1. No squatting fnames + channels has been Dan's position from Day 1 and he's never wavered in the messaging 2. Channels aren't in the protocol yet and that's also v clear 3. Context matters and this is the context lol
9 replies
7 recasts
45 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
On point 1 - It's very clear in the docs that fnames are Farcaster controlled and explains later conditions for taking it back If someone's upset by that, then they can always use .eth ENS names - feels like a pretty reasonable compromise to me. https://docs.farcaster.xyz/learn/architecture/ens-names
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
on point 2 - also very clearly in the docs and explains squatting positions lower down in the page too Not sure what else Dan could do to make this more obvious without getting pretty paternal with it. https://docs.farcaster.xyz/learn/what-is-farcaster/channels
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
On point 3 about context (imo the most important one)... Flippers of names, assets, NFTs, or w/e else always point out that Web3 is PVP with buy/sell/trades. If you willingly RENT access to a CENTRALIZED service in the hopes of selling it later bc you didn't read the docs that's entirely an self-inflicted injury lol
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Fwiw idgaf about Bankless and I don't think they give a fuck about farcaster either since they only started posted here consistently when it was obviously better for distribution and tbh i also don't think Dan gives a fuck about Bankless either, it's just obviously a huge brand in web3 and he needs them using FC
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
i can't believe i had to write a thread on this on a Friday night, but somebody other than Dan has to say calmly using data lol Anyway nobody who's building in good faith on Farcaster is concerned about the channel squatter thing
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
and while i know you are engagement baiting dude it's super irresponsible we gotta default be on the same team w stuff like this bc bad faith critics are ecstatic at the chance to talk shit about the 1 bright spot in web3 social rn they want us dead. https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/?id=farcaster-name-controversy
8 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
That web3 is going great article was excellent. Good summary of the issue, got the facts right, etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
not sure if serious 🫠
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Sincere!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
fully disagree It’s a selective telling of the story to make Dan look disingenuous and incompetent, fails to mention any of the existing documentation about how the behavior explicitly violated preset guidelines, provides no platform context, and is clearly written to pander to people who want to see crypto fail
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction