What’s the counter point to @altimor’s take that there’s no real adoption of crypto?

Sorry but it feels true that the only adoption has come from technical ppl and speculators whereas normies were using Amazon, Google, Salesforce, etc much earlier — and at the very least the use cases were more clear

good overview from @tomasz here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixpUHiP014M&list=WL&index=2

Unless I’m missing something it seems like this and every other argument boils down to it’s still early?

i guess it depends on how you define “adoption”? 2.5m daus might or might not constitute “real” depending on who you ask. same for token market caps and lp tvl: to some the numbers are unseriously low, to others, promisingly high

My problem with the comparison to web and being early are that it’s 1) not early 2) way more capital and attention than the web

"early" again depends on the eye of the beholder. per dan's comment to flo in moz: "crypto is 15yrs old" (https://youtu.be/ttDuKqJRZaw?t=6136) is that early or not early?