Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fabric
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
womp womp pour one out for permissionless composability. gg @colin https://warpcast.com/wanderloots.eth/0xcf4ad939
6 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Why did you decide to sunset this feature @colin?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
probably because hypersub competes with their current approach to monetization
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
But why are these primitives (subscriptions vs. JIT payments via mint) mutually exclusive? Ideally creators would be able to use whatever economic tools they need in the moment If it’s a matter of rev share, could hypersub pay some bps to the point of origination (ie. Paragraph in this case)?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
> But why are these primitives (subscriptions vs. JIT payments via mint) mutually exclusive? because when writers airdrop collectible versions of their posts to hypersub members paragraph can't collect a fee > Ideally creators would be able to use whatever economic tools they need in the moment agreed—this is the whole point of permissionlessly composable systems: creator freedom, ownership, and the option to choose > If it’s a matter of rev share, could hypersub pay some bps to the point of origination (ie. Paragraph in this case)? yes—we designed STP2 for this specific use case https://docs.withfabric.xyz/stp/fees#client-fees
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
