Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nixo
@nixo
1/5 🧵 Ethereum's All Core Devs regular Thursday protocol development call: ACD Consensus #151 20 Feb 14:00 UTC (same ETH time, same ETH channel) Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum/pm/issues/1280 EthMag: https://ethmag.org/tags/c/protocol-calls/63/acdc Pectra Retrospective: https://ethmag.org/t/pectra-retrospective/22637 Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMXhEnc4PZk
2 replies
6 recasts
33 reactions
nixo
@nixo
2/5 🧵 Pectra: ▶️ It's going very smoothly but some consensus clients are seeing a bug on devnet-6 around attestation aggregation (related to EIP-7549) - progress on this? ▶️ General testnet (Holešky & Sepolia) readiness check
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
nixo
@nixo
3/5 🧵 Fusaka: ▶️ Blobs: what do we bump this to in Fusaka? ▶️ PeerDAS progress update ▶️ @jimmygchen may have a solution for a scalability bottleneck in PeerDAS by shifting KZG proof computation from block proposers to tx senders, which would help scale faster https://hackmd.io/@jimmygchen/HkUpFliYJx
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nixo
@nixo
4/5 🧵 Hardware & bandwidth: ▶️ @kevaundray is calling for finalizing max-blobs flag - would mean that validators are able to specify how many blobs they're willing to propagate ▶️ Also calling for finalization on hardware & bandwidth requirements EIP (EIP-7870) https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/9270
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nixo
@nixo
5/5 🧵 Fork cadence? Not on the agenda, but we may see some more convo about how often we should fork & what could improve to be more efficient. Last call saw a soft decision to freeze Fusaka spec in 3 weeks... which meant people had to get v vocal about what they thought should go in. We may see more of this!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
pa7x1
@pa7x1
Thanks for these writeups @nixo
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
