Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nico🦊
@nicom
About TX fees: comparing apple to apple requires to compare subcent fees on L2 paid by users to fees (% or fixed) paid for providing bank card payments by traditional sellers. The L2 fee is smaller and paid by the buyer, most of the time (the seller could initiate a refund tx but this is an edge case). The current price of goods includes this seller fee (talking here about goods with displayed prices, not the ones you negotiate live, but even live, sellers actually count their spending). If this fee is moved on the buyer side, goods price should be lowered. It should lead to a situation where we have 2 prices: traditional fiat and crypto. We should have the fee stay on the seller side by having them pay for the buyer gas (delegation) and allow them to keep the good price same for both fiat and crypto. Sellers would even probably save some money with the L2 fee, increasing the incentive to allow crypto payments at their places.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nico🦊
@nicom
Also, I'm talking about goods for which the fee is a significant part of the price, not Lambos but food bites, a tea cup, a glass of, a fruit, ...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
