Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Please spread the word: there are 0 economic rewards—currently or in the future—for running a Hub. Only run a Hub if you: 1. Find it fun 2. Find it useful for your project or your business There's no surprise or gotcha that comes later. All of the YouTube video tutorials are lying to you about a potential reward.
13 replies
67 recasts
110 reactions
Mark 🎩
@web3withmark
Yes crypto Twitter has been going on about this. I think what happened is some projects rewarded some people for running hubs with an airdrop and now they think it’s going to happen for everything @0xbdandrew this is what we were talking about. @dwr.eth out of curiosity - are there any negative side effects to this growth (other than people not getting rewards)
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Makes the network slower
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
It's surprising to me that Farcaster suffers when more Hubs come online. Is this a technical limitation to be overcome or an inalienable aspect of the network's design? Is there an ideal number of Hubs?
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Ideal is closer to 100 imo. Function of how much data is being generated and how many Hubs are gossiping messages. Significantly more data than blockchains.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Chris
@chrisdom
its most likely because you need to connect to different hubs to get data, so if the hub is on a shitty $5 vps (the vercel killer as we know) then fetching data will be slow. they could implement a "lag" metric and ignore hubs with huge lag, but this gets very complex quickly. i also don't know what im talking about so take it with a bucket of salt.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Mark 🎩
@web3withmark
Yeah me too. I thought the more hubs would mean faster, more secure and reliable. But then Ive always thought of hubs being like nodes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
