is there a great channel for only high quality observations about what you’re reading, or should i start it?

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Building /bright-moments - minting onchain art IRL | /purple #15 | FID 129 #magikarp

Rome, Metropolitan City of Rome Capital, Italy

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com 

solidity & product & art. weekly crypto dev interviews @ web3galaxybrain.com. follow zora.co/nicholas

curious what @phil @july @v @keccers.eth and @dwr.eth think. thinking about a post-update channel with very restrictive membership to only people who post quality reading observations. who else is a big reader?

Books

maybe /books itself will become like this @phil?

i notice for myself that i post to /books but never see anything from that channel despite being subscribed. i think resetting membership of these “big” channels will be a big shift. tbd if @dwr.eth surfaces posts from channels i follow in feed more than (anecdotally non scientifically *feels* like i see them) now

I like the idea of stricter channel membership rules as a means to increase quality, but I don’t know if it will get me to browse channels the way that I used to. 

They lost me on channels a long time ago. I occasionally post to them, but never ever ever nav to the channel page to read them anymore, because of how lost quality they all are. It’s hard for me to envision how they will get me to go back, even though theoretically the new system will create content I would enjoy. Not sure how I am supposed to discover it