Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
iSpeakNerd π§ββοΈ
@ispeaknerd.eth
this incredibly disappointing response from a prominent fc dev on requesting tracking curated streaks rather than raw at the core: are channels communities with taste (which inherently means uplifting some content and ignoring others) or are they simply content aggregators (hashtags)? those of us working to build community beyond "buy my shit" are unsupported by the current meta and it'd be helpful to have the meta clarified. @cameron @jpren.eth @adrienne @ccarella @nounishprof @benna @christin @toadyhawk.eth @matthew @ahn.eth If we're building in a direction that won't be supported, would like to know so i can stop caring so much. from the dev perspective: protocol should be unbiased yes, but app layer works best opinionated, & social layer even moreso. Pls give us tools to highlight folks doing the deal providing conversational liquidity and making the scenius. It shouldn't all be ranks and metrics to determine quality, that gets gamed. even merkle has heavy hand picking "best casters" kthxbye
9 replies
2 recasts
12 reactions
Nounish Prof ββ§-β§π©
@nounishprof
Can understand your frustration. Rounds may be a good work around here -- you can hide those that don't qualify. It would be cool to have a similar implementation for streaks where a mod could optionally hide what doesn't apply. I have no idea what it would take from a technical perspective.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
iSpeakNerd π§ββοΈ
@ispeaknerd.eth
its not that hard technically, filter by "did the moderator account like the cast" @neynar has an endpoint specifically for it. or index + filter the raw feed yourself (like @buoy does) if you don't wanna pay SQL prices from neynar (which i get) https://warpcast.com/kevinoconnell/0x3b31f016
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Neynar
@neynar
dont have to pay sql prices to use the api, pretty much all apis are available on the $9 starter tier
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
