frames-v2

added a fallback for FC clients not yet supporting V2 frames (e.g. Warpcast web)

clicking on a link opens Ape as a web app

dynamic OG image is rendered as well

just because the best practices aren’t written yet doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do them anyway!

✅ graceful fallback to OpenGraph where fc:frame v2 is not supported
✅ graceful fallback when visited on web

Building @warpcast and @farcaster, new dad, like making food

I think the website should gracefully adapt to frame v2, not the opposite 😅

Developer…not enough? // Working on /landingpay and Lett3r.love // /yellow collective noun #63

Yes, a focused UX is surely better.

I’m just saying the content of the frame is a webpage at first, the fact it lives in a specific environment is secondary.

I think this is why frames v2 are way better than v1, using a web browser gives the developer more possibilities.

maybe my guess is the most successful frames will be purpose built for frames since they’ll provide the best UX

vs websites trying to fit into the frame mold