Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
Alright, so here's what I'm seeing, Nouns Terminal was already funded with at least 25 ETH, right? Kinda odd that this isn't mentioned in the proposal. Plus, it's been open-sourced for a few months now. Even though it says the project is open for self-use, I'm still wondering, I noticed there’s no license on the project that clarify that, without a license it could not be used legally in a lot of jurisdiction and ethically I assume everywhere. https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/676
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
W1NTΞR
@w1nt3r
Nouns Terminal was indeed funded with 25 ETH 3 years ago, along with 2 other clients. It was way before client incentives was even an idea. Nouns goal (as I see it) was to kick off alternative frontends effort. Agora was funded around that time as well. The prop was framed as initial small grant, with expectation of an additional round if things go well (e.g. Agora did get end up getting more funding). Nouns Terminal also had an autobidder bots that brought 8 sales (237 ETH) at the time. After initial development, I have kept the lights on, but haven't worked on the project, and didn't ask for more funding. It was used only by a few fans until @yukigesho got interested in Nouns, at which point we've open sourced it and started modernization. You can see 300+ commits since May (the time Yuki joined) https://github.com/nouns-terminal/nouns-terminal The license was just an oversight, no ill intent here. We've added MIT license (same as most OSS Nouns projects)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
LilPing
@pingfeng
@quaestor How do you think of Lulu's questioning on Nouns proposal 676?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0x4b1d
@0x4b1d
Can you please send me the 25ETH prop? I thought the project was never been funded before. open source license issue is very important here too.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
