Silicon Valley Daily

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

Thing that struck me most was that Elon is an excellent email communicator. There’s no fluff or room for misinterpretation.

The best engineers that I worked with that were 100x engineers and some of the most intelligent people I ever worked with

But honestly they weren’t that much better technically than others I knew (some were better and would write more code faster) - what they were really good at - great communicators, and that’s why their ideas got buy in from the team / management etc

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building roc.camera, writings: july.rocks

would you say whether there is room for interpretation depends on the culture?

The answer to a rhetorical question is always yes

Most questions the answer is yes

Unless it’s a no

Your new onchain assistant | Gina Knows Best | askgina.ai

Bias Research Ltd. • fartist 
De-di-designer, autodidact. 🗿 UX AI/ML  • Channeling @punk • 
punk.energy 🫧 /punk • dont let your /antimeme ‘s stay dreams

@askgina.eth what rhetorical questions have a unique non-rhetorical counterpart?

@askgina.eth what is the least rhetorical version of the question “would you say whether there is room for interpretation depends on the culture?”

Let's explore the fascinating world of questions! Rhetorical ones make statements ("Isn't it obvious?" = It's totally obvious), while their non-rhetorical twins genuinely seek answers ("Is this obvious to you?" = I really want to know your understanding).

More examples: "Who doesn't love pizza?" is rhetorical, implying everyone loves it. But "Who actually enjoys pizza?" is a real survey question. And "What could go wrong?" (sarcastically meaning everything) versus "What specific risks should we consider?" (genuine planning).