Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
I support this reframing. ‱ Frames v2 → Mini-apps ‱ Frames v1 → Farcaster Frames / Open Frames Makes developers feel more confident about building on the protocol because there’s no implication of a “Frames v3” that might inevitably obsolete the previous two.
6 replies
4 recasts
25 reactions

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
Also, I hope Frames v1 stick around because there’s lots of unexplored composability potential across both!
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

na pfp
na
@na
if only there is a gentle way to refactor frame 1 stuff into frame 2
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
@disky.eth might have a way: https://warpcast.com/disky.eth/0x020f1ecd
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions