let's talk about some of the weaknesses of farcaster:
1. there are huge power laws to follower distribution based on if you were here early
2. a lot of followers seem not to be real or are totally inactive
3. a lot of content and conversation is crypto heavy
4. there's much financialization of interactions
what else?

In defense of micromanagement

Delegation is over-rated, micro-management is under-rated and misunderstood.

 Zuck talks about this
“probably one of my most controversial leadership or management things is I don’t actually believe in delegating that much. I kinda think like the way a founder should work is you should basically make as many decisions and get involved as in as many things as you can”


Every great founder in my experience  does the above - see Elon or Jensen Huang. 

They are in the details – every technical nuance, every financial model’s implications, every pixel. I rarely see a great company run in any other way.


The natural question that gets asked is: doesn’t this make every leader below them unhappy? I’ll answer this empirically: look at the core leadership team of any of these companies and you’ll see they have the same set of people for many, many years

building far.quest & /farmarket. cofounder at miy.com ventures. FID #274. Previously Square/Cash App. hi_im_nico.twitter

code @ spindl.xyz. Interested in technology, history, and music // farcaster.network

If you want to start a new society, why do you want it?

Usually because there is deep dissatisfaction with the existing system.

It doesn’t represent you. 
You can’t reform it. 
You have no say in it.
You didn’t consent to it.
For you, it’s not democratic.

So, you exit and build anew.

Tafareo

@mzt