Max Jackson on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

erica pfp

i'm going to fail at putting this into words but i want to have this discussion: i have noticed that most popular philosophy focuses on detachment (stoicism, buddhism/taoism, rationality and abstract reasoning, etc) most of philosophy was generated in a time where women weren't allowed to contribute to the larger collective knowledge or participate in any educational system so my discussion/q is: if most philosophy originates from men, who historically view attachment (and therefor, emotion) as largely negative, what would philosophy be like if people more accepting of and in touch with their emotions contributed to the field of philosophy? is stoicism really a philosophy that can help you feel better, when most current research indicates that connection and community are the biggest predictors of life satisfaction? (my little research did show me that female philosophers focus on relationality, embodiment, care ethics, less abstract/universal philosophies, situated knowledge vs absolute knowledge, etc)

18 replies

8 recasts

78 reactions

erica pfp

like, is original philosophy from BC times (when it was all men) really just ancient dudes being like "emotions make me uncomfortable and idk how to deal with them or talk about them, so let's get rid of them" ??

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

Max Jackson pfp

The only form of philosophy I've really taken an interest in is Zen Buddhism. In my understanding it is closer to what you're saying is the female perspective on philosophy. Being in the moment rather than detaching. Rather, you detach from ideas and recognize your feelings without holding a stubborn grip on them.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

erica pfp

okay i like this! i may have confuddled the material attachment of buddhism with emotional attachment zen buddhism still allows space for emotions you're saying, just don't hold onto them like with grudges or such?

3 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Max Jackson pfp

I'd say the simplest way to think of it is go with the flow. If you're going with the a flow and something genuinely upsets you, your impulse reaction to it is part of your true self, not something else.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction