Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sonso.eth
@sonso
now that “onchain” is what Base intends to call everything done on the blockchain as a successor term to web3. What are we going to call art that specifically is written onto the blockchain itself or uses the blockchain as part of the art?
13 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Ture
@musiconchain
In my view the distinction is overblown to a degree “Onchain-ness” should be viewed as a spectrum If we constrain the value of tokenization to only things that can be stuffed directly onchain, it’s missing the point, and will exclude a lot of significant media that isn’t practical to fit “fully onchain”
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Ture
@musiconchain
I say this as someone who owns many “fully onchain” NFTs and loves them. It’s also my prediction that re-minting NFTs will become common practice over time as many will inevitably be lost for various reasons. In this case it won’t matter much how onchain your NFT is, but rather the chain of provenance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
No one is constraining the tokenization of things to stuff stored onchain. That's the entire point, tokenization and onchain storage are different things. So why is Base co-opting an art niche to its marketing efforts? Because it has high reputation, built by onchain artists.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
