Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sonso.eth pfp
sonso.eth
@sonso
now that “onchain” is what Base intends to call everything done on the blockchain as a successor term to web3. What are we going to call art that specifically is written onto the blockchain itself or uses the blockchain as part of the art?
13 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
I already felt Base was a corporate L2 with its centralized sequencer, small multisig, Coinbase connection, etc But learning they're trying to co-opt & market a term that only has a reputation because of the artists working on it takes it to the next level of cringe for me.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
bashobits 🚅✨🔵💨🫐 pfp
bashobits 🚅✨🔵💨🫐
@bashobits
can it be a spectrum? there's already debates about what's "true" onchain vs. "almost true" onchain, etc and those debates can continue reality is grandma doesn't care though
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Travis LeRoy Southworth💎🎩 pfp
Travis LeRoy Southworth💎🎩
@travisleroy
Oh, so they are just rebranding, its not on-chain?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
marka pfp
marka
@marka
f.o.c runtime art protocol truth compressionist art world computer generative art or just: art
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
John Palmer 💡 pfp
John Palmer 💡
@john
on-chain
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Figure pfp
Figure
@figure31
Blockchain Art?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
buffets pfp
buffets
@buffets
There's probably a spectrum for "onchainness". But I think the term, smart contract art, could be broad enough to encompass this category of art that specifically utilises the blockchain as its primary medium to express its underlying concept or aesthetics. Downside is that this term may not cover inscriptions.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
archivist pfp
archivist
@archivist
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Maxorgel 🎩 pfp
Maxorgel 🎩
@maxo
Im sorry to tell you but it seems like inchain might have its moment.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ture pfp
Ture
@musiconchain
In my view the distinction is overblown to a degree “Onchain-ness” should be viewed as a spectrum If we constrain the value of tokenization to only things that can be stuffed directly onchain, it’s missing the point, and will exclude a lot of significant media that isn’t practical to fit “fully onchain”
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
silv pfp
silv
@silv.eth
how about artblocks, that name is open, right?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
m/branson pfp
m/branson
@mbranson
have been chewing on this myself. it’s always been more of an integration of code vs code sitting on top. inscription obv doesn’t work. integrated art sounds…not right. unsure.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sartocrates🃏 pfp
sartocrates🃏
@sartocrates
i have a little bit of a contrarian take in that i dont really think it matters much what you call it as long as its fkn sweet
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction