In compare with Lens protocol. What do you think the better data solution (data architecture) 
 https://i.imgur.com/tOVNQEz.png

Co-founder of db3.network
Build data layer for web3

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

1/n ) As to web3 social protocol , 4 key things to care about: [1]unique identity totally controlled by user , [2]user relationship owned by user, [3] content and content relation (post, likes...)  ownership and public available , [4] terminal apps (client) .

2/n) The importance is different , [1],[2] better stored on- chain, [3] is less important ,can be stored on a p2p network without absolute consensus, [4] app is least important, user can switch as the want .

4/n) Farcaster do it total differently, only [1] is on-chain(ETH),  [2][3] on a self-build p2p network which is a sufficient decentralized and store dynamic data . Some benefit of Farcaster: data storage is cheaper and easer for dev to retrieve.

3/n ) The different between Lens and Farcaster is that: Lens put everything on Matic which can guarantee [1][2][3]  but expensive and not friendly for developers to build apps:  every app have to depend on a centralized server ;