Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Introducing: Seemore's "Thread to Frame" Tool ๐Ÿ‘€ We teased this Monday, saw the demand, and decided to skip a beta and just freaking ship it. It's as simple as... 1. Cast your thread 2. Input the warpcast url below 3. Cast the new url to display your frame! https://seemore.tv/creatortools/fcthreads/
20 replies
48 recasts
143 reactions

Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ– pfp
Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ–
@mstublefield.eth
For proper threading, should I: A) submit subsequent messages (2, 3, 4, 5) as a reply to my first reply, or B) submit subsequent messages as a reply to the message I'm originally replying to, or c) submit subsequent messages as a reply to the preceding message (2 replies to 1, 3 replies to 2, etc.)?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Right now I believe it has to be: A. A new top level cast from you B. The next cast as a reply to the top level one C. The rest of the casts all replying to the previous one And if you do 2 replies on your top level, we default to the longest chain (i need to recheck the code though we shipped a lot last week haha)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ– pfp
Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ–
@mstublefield.eth
So B replies to C, then C replies to B, then D, E, F, G, H, etc. all reply to C?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Sorry no - think recursive replies like classic bird app threading format
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction