Finally made the switch to Logseq from Roam. Quite straightforward and enjoying the exp. so far.

Main downside: really feeling the difference in page / block latency. Used to working in deep nested blocks with lotsa volume. Roam rarely buckled. Logseq seems to struggle often, meaning I have to watch my block depth / volume.

Finally made the switch to Logseq from Roam. Quite straightforward and enjoying the exp. so far.

Main downside: really feeling the difference in page / block latency. Used to working in deep nested blocks with lotsa volume. Roam rarely buckled. Logseq seems to struggle often, meaning I have to watch my block depth / volume.
https://logseq.com/

Really brings home the idea that speed matters.

in motion | founder, researcher, scout, storyteller | into computing, communication, complex systems | rewilding the web with subset.network | hq: msweet.net

Really brings home the idea that speed matters.
https://jsomers.net/blog/speed-matters

Optimal UX latency is akin to embodied sensory signal transmission speed?

Is Roam’s superior UX latency mostly a consequence of using Clojure?

Is Roam’s superior UX latency mostly a consequence of using Clojure?
https://clojure.org/about/rationale

If so, that seems like a ridiculous advantage for apps like Logseq and Roam.

Optimal UX latency is akin to embodied sensory signal transmission speed?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense