Content pfp
Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

df pfp
df
@df
Considering different decentralized storage options. IPFS vs Arweave vs L2 Onchain Which would you use today if you had to store small amounts of text metadata for a project?
19 replies
4 recasts
29 reactions

Mikko pfp
Mikko
@moo
IPFS is not a persistent storage, but a cache/CDN. Think it more of BitTorrent.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

df pfp
df
@df
answers may be incentivized stacks on top (like Filecoin). I take it you wouldn't choose IPFS then?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mikko pfp
Mikko
@moo
IPFS is just a content distribution mechanism. Same as HTTP. The content persistency can be backed by Filecoin, Arweave and I believe maybe Storj. Like HTTP, IPFS is not storage.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mikko pfp
Mikko
@moo
Chia is also coming, but they have currently a lot of centralisation AFAIK https://datalayer.storage/ From Bram Cohen, of BitTorrent fame
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction