Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A bit puzzled by the people who continue to insist that open channels without any gating or spam filtering would work just fine. When I mention there would be a lot of spam, they tell me I'm wrong or they would manually weed it out. We tried that for the last year and it didn't work. Very few channel owners / moderators wanted to do the drudgery of cleaning up spammy casts. It's not fun or rewarding. And that's logical on their end! The reason web2 doesn't have this problem: 1. The successful companies like Meta or YouTube have *10s of thousands* of ops people moderating the platform; they also have massive data sets and AI models to help 2. They are centralized. They can *delete* spammy accounts and there's no recourse. 3. X / Twitter got rid of most of their ops people, so you see *a lot* more spam on there. Additionally, #hashtags on Twitter have been spammy for 10 years. Just look at the following link: https://x.com/hashtag/Ethereum
14 replies
5 recasts
40 reactions
MOΞ
@moe
do you think the warpcast spam detection model used for replies will be good enough to be used for channel feeds at some point?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Possibly, but the issue will be hosts want more control than a default Warpcast algo. So at some point it's a hybrid. I'm optimistic that membership creates more of an incentive for channel owners / mods to want to build actual communities, especially once they are decentralized and onchain.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
