Watched the Bankless w Yudkowsky. I feel that if he is wrong, it may be because AGI has no drive to physically expand, or because it needs our electricity generation, and the destruction of us cannot be swift.

I’m here to make friends.
Orchestrator of Dash Platform developments @DashCoreGroup.

Us. We will have to build the first ones for them.

What prevents superintelligence to create robots as a physical extension?

"Qu'est-ce que la vie? Une halte dans l'antichambre de la mort."

Our intelligence does not grow like AGIs.

He is wrong.

There are already eight billion AGIs on this planet (humans), and they are doing just fine.

AlicΞ lives a L2+ life. Born on StarkEx, believing that validity Rollups (aka zkRollups) will eat the world.  Lately very lazy … 🌳 minttrees.xyz 🌳

I mean we cannot control or understand what reward means to AGI.
If people evaporated today, I’m not sure how long most grids would remain functional. I don’t expect it’s more than several days.

not sure I understand your arguments correctly, isn’t the “drive” of an AI dependent on the reward system? 
Based on the definition used in the Bankless podcast an AGI is superior in every decision making process in every area. I have hard times believing that electricity generation will be an issue. 🤔

I saw him lose a debate to Robin Hanson on this, ironically at Jane Street Capital, when I was in college ~2012

I became paralized/depressed after reading Yudkowsky’s article about AI lethalities. Anyone feeling the same?