Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kenny 🎩
@kenny
for anyone curious this is the reason we can't have a chronological feed (even though 90%+ of users want one) Warpcast team doesn't see that the quality of the algo feed is downstream of having the basics right (chronological feed ensures good visibility for new posts early on, boosting quality of discussion) so instead they try to tweak an algo that isn't being fed good enough content in the first place
10 replies
2 recasts
23 reactions
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
I don’t understand such a hard stance. Can’t a simple toggle be added?
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
kenny 🎩
@kenny
he says it's a product philosophy thing, as in if they add it, they are taking their eye off the ball of crafting the perfect algo crafting the perfect algo is super easy tho, surely it will be done any day now
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
MJC
@mjc716
usually when I think hard enough about something Dan is being stubborn about I realize he’s probably right, but this one I really can’t figure out, especially with all the real time politics stuff happening
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kenny 🎩
@kenny
I don't get it either when they originally took away the chronological feed in February I reached out to him directly saying how badly it had degraded feed quality, he agreed, and told me it was a temporary option and things would be back to normal within weeks then I guess someone got in his ear? somewhere along the line it's become a very stubborn stance
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
