Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Evan pfp
Evan
@evanvanness
Lido is a systemic risk to ETH https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/dashboard/analytics
6 replies
10 recasts
20 reactions

Q🎩 pfp
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
Which EIP do you support to enshrine liquid staking?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ayush pfp
Ayush
@ayushm.eth
Can you state some of them? Quick search didn't lead to anything
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Q🎩 pfp
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
That was kind of the point. If limiting single actor stake is that critical, there should be an enshrined solution. If it is a systemic risk, the system should defend itself. It’s silly to ask a business to not make money.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Evan pfp
Evan
@evanvanness
I'm looking forward to uber ultrasound money when we soft fork out the lido attackers
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Q🎩 pfp
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
An interesting question we laugh at Gary for. What is sufficiently decentralized? If Lido does permissionless validators & DVT, is that good? What is the balance of 30 permissioned, XX permissionless solos, XX squads that is safe and doesn’t chill innovation from builders worried about being shut down for success.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MinimalGravitas pfp
MinimalGravitas
@minimalgravitas
The number of operators is a red herring, it's the binary distinction between permissioned/permissionless that matters. Lido DAO decides who can run their validators, and in almost every decision the top 2 or 3 holders have controlled > 50% of the vote. https://gov.optimism.io/t/draft-gf-phase-1-proposal-lido/2752/5
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Q🎩 pfp
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
Iirc they are releasing (not yet) products for both solo and squad permissionless validation. Obv planned is not enough. Once released and adopted is there a threshold of vote% that is ok, or are you saying if any portion is permissioned it’s a no go?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction