Ethereum

Some mistakes I’m seeing people make when discussing the proposed issuance curve changes 
- this is a discussion, it’s not intended for immediate inclusion
- the sustainability of the burn is not the issue 
- the total supply of ETH is not the concern 

What is it then? 👇

Ethereum enthusiasts 
Public goods are good

The aim is to address the natural consequences of PoS.

The devs are pondering whether having upto 100% of ETH staked is desirable or even dangerous.

The concern is that the incentives in a 100% StEth world would force out solo stakers.

Solo stakers are ethereums super power and need to be preserved. 2/n

Is it necessary? Maybe, maybe not.

It’s important to start the debate before staking reaches a higher percentage.

After that it becomes exponentialy harder to change.

If I’ve missed something or got something wrong. Please educate :) 
@sassal.eth @joncharbonneau @hasu 

4/4

The debate is around finding a desirable terminal staking rate.

30%? 50? 70?

The proposed changes would make it undesirable to stake after a certain percentage is reached via decreasing or even negative issuance. 3/n