Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Chris Carella
@ccarella.eth
Nouns is an emergent org which is something to love about it. As new members engage and others step back, or as entities acquire substantial governance stakes, the DAO's direction and ethos adapt accordingly. These transitions, while potentially disorienting, ultimately reflect the collective will of the community. Recently, I've become more attuned to this evolving meta, recognizing a shift towards a revitalized and healthy vision. Its probably time for me to step back, not because I disagree with the emergent meta but because it's not the right time for me to be in multiple discords, calls and dms to understand the meta. I'm looking for a delegate who would. I look forward to where Nouns is going while my heart will always be tied to the version that had an unwavering love and support for Ethereum and Ethereum Public Goods. ⌐◨-◨
6 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
mike good ⌐◨-◨
@mikegood
'disorienting' is a good way to put it. Sometimes i'm not sure if i'm watching a train wreck, or a train being built. So many thoughts, so much time and mind-share invested into nouns and the ecosystem. Feels bad watching anons dominate the auction and put everything into question.. but i guess the show will go on and we'll see where this leads. mikegood.eth if you're up to consider me for delegate 😅 🫶
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
krel
@krel
not trying to be disingenuous here, genuinely curious: are you not anon? is the difference just depth of pockets or something else? i understand the notion that things can feel uncertain when new members enter with large voting power but this is the nature of the experiment -- in theory, you or me or anyone could amass a large number of votes. And if we think/agree that auction price is at all correlated with longterm success of nouns, is not attracting participants like Jane exactly what we want and are all trying to achieve?
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
mike good ⌐◨-◨
@mikegood
No, I’m not anon? I’m here in conversation. I get on nouns calls daily/weekly and share my thoughts. I vote… The block amassing votes isn’t, right? We have no clue what their intentions are, is my point. Jane and Co have not claimed they’re the ones buying all the tokens.. so not sure if it’s them, or someone else. But when a bot consistently buys tokens (typically stifling nouns growth, member-wise) it makes you wonder and speculate on long term intentions. Yes you or me ‘could’ buy this many tokens.. but likely wouldn’t at this speed without also contributing and sharing our vision for nouns. Right now their vision is unclear and unspoken, which makes it feel uncertain.
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
krel
@krel
thats very subjective though? thinking about it now, in reality i actually have a better idea of janes vision and intentions that yours
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
lil 67
@pip
What's your irl identity then?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
