Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
3 things can be true: 1. invaluable to praise publicly, criticize privately (sometimes publicly if done in good faith) 2. intellectual honesty is a hallmark of most FC OGs (don’t assert otherwise) 3. @geoffgolberg asks great analytical Qs, but not v tactical in communicating in progress-oriented collaborative way
11 replies
8 recasts
43 reactions
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
I've been in a fair number of DCs with Geoff. He means well, he really does. But yeah, sometimes it doesn't always come out as smoothly as it could.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Really not understanding what he is trying to accomplish right now, but watching all of this come through my feeds today is disheartening. Should have been a more celebratory moment watching people coming back to cast.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Future of Radio pfp
Future of Radio
@michael-smith
I would think he has a valid concern and is saying it because it needs to be said. I am a new caster, but I have many years of experience in off chain decentralization. I also love the block chain. I think everyone should count him as valuable, with no strings attached. Especially if his statement is approaching true about the number of active casters. Let's make the number of active casters an important weight. Set goals to double and triple the numbers. Knowing lots of work is already being done to achieve the same goal, and hope the market continues to improve to make it a bit easier. Without silence breakers, we are all doomed to at the most, spectacular failures.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
As I've mentioned to Geoff before, all media companies, digital and traditional struggle with this. At the end of the day this is a "soft" number that is great for motivating your community, rallying your audience and helping to validate what people are feeling and experiencing each day, which is, we are heading in the right direction. Even print uses something called a pass along rate, which can 10x the number of daily average readers. All media does this. So, I'm not concerned about "perfection" when it comes to the presentation of this kind of information and don't think anyone, esp Jason or even Dan should be called out for using the brighter side of the information available to tell their story. 9 out of 10 dentist agree with me. As I mentioned to Geoff, he's got good intentions, but the way he frames his concerns, come off as accusations, not conversations. That's problematic, when everyone here is open to his ideas. At least that's what I've seen since I've been around, which isn't long.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Future of Radio pfp
Future of Radio
@michael-smith
Thank you so much for replying back to me. I hear what your saying. "80% of all data is bad," someone said. I think the best way to solve concerns is about 50% data and 50% human narratives. In decentralization, near consensus is important, and so is authentic dissent. I just have empathy for him, because he proble earned it. Mad respect for the OG's and the conversation.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Empathy is always a great place to start any conversation. But, I don't think anyone is ganging up on him, so I wouldn't worry. You can't come into someone else's house, start poking your finger at them, implying wrong doing or negligence and act shocked when they or the community they've created starts to reject you. I'm sure the OGs have some really strong opinions about this since they've been here for all of the ebbs and flows and want to know how to make an audience stick as much as anyone. They are also comprised of truly brilliant people, lots of technologists and devs, who generally aren't particularly fond of what they consider narrative or hype. So, different strokes for different folks. As for replying. Its a pleasure! It's what I do! ✌️ 😁 Take care Michael. I'll see you in the feeds. 👊 😁
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Future of Radio pfp
Future of Radio
@michael-smith
Thank you, when we blend the code with verified fairness (human narrative) then it will stand the test of time. An example is the conversations led by the OGs on @farcaster where helpful insights are always found. Farcaster is an important construct in a chaotic global ecosystem. My point is there are thousands of casters that could help, and help with conservations that next level many things, so I think we believe the conservation need to start with the public good, in a positive way.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction