Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/higher
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
This could be a great way to create and support more Higher-aligned projects If you’re thinking of launching a Higher-like token and haven’t yet - would this be interesting to you?
6 replies
0 recast
28 reactions

McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
I would have used this for /plus
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Narrator: it’s not too late. I see 160k mcap, 120k liquidity with 11.5 eth. I know switching costs are annoying money & time-wise but we should be able to fix it for genuine builders, communities considering the shared upside and I’m sure the 10 eth aren’t even lost in a migration. Thinking (from bad to good) 1️⃣ just launching a new token hurts current investors. Nothing worse than sudden surprises. 2️⃣ we take a snapshot, issue a new token and “make existing investors move to the new token in correct order to have the same cap table again just with another liquidity pair” (practically migration contract would be needed where people sell current token for eth, you issue new tokens & use eth proceeds to buy higher and add to liquidity) 3️⃣ we do the same as in 2️⃣ but you can adjust distribution with new token to fix other issues (fund DAO wallet, team, offer incentives for liquidity providers or xyz) @martin 2️⃣3️⃣ might be interesting for more existing projects to copy?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions