Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
after the Lex x Beff pod, i am more skeptical of than persuaded by e/acc: -URL vibes are 1000% hyper masculine, but the IRL vibes are… not, to put it bluntly -the sense it was started as satire, unexpectedly took off w/o a strong foundation, and now they’ve doubled down due to sunk cost fallacy any counters? SOS
30 replies
13 recasts
68 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
5 likes but no replies… does that mean you guys share skepticism but have no counters?
5 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
miguelito
@mc
What’s to counter? The whole thing was a clown show from the beginning, premised on false dichotomies. And yet it was being perpetuated through the availability cascades. Why? Cui bono?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
can you say more? not 100% following
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
miguelito
@mc
The argument to accelerate at any cost, and irrespective of risks, is a fundamentally unserious position And the with-us-or-against-us tenor revealed the advocates to be fundamentally unserious people There are more than the two options of acceleration vs moving backwards
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
miguelito
@mc
Nevertheless, this “movement” sucked the oxygen out of our timelines for a bit It was being pushed through social media, podcasts by availability entrepreneurs, with few questions asked Why were they doing so? To what end? https://pmarca.substack.com/p/availability-cascades-run-the-world
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
