In you're in favor of "AI safety" (broad definition), what's your most compelling cast-length argument?

The technology is obviously epochal, but its path still largely unknown. 

It’s appropriate to have at least *some* humility toward “known unknowns” of a historical magnitude.

building /bracket | talking /greatbooks | ex-BCG, ex-PHD | poli + phil + econ

Atomic, but at least we had some theoretical models based in science. AI safety nerds use imaginary rhetoricals

Are there any theoretical models based in science for AGI? Should we not maybe get some of those?

Interested in ZK, FHE, PUFs, hardware, system design, ai safety, and smart contact security.

There’s no model for our human sentience / consciousness / GI. Ask any neuroscientist. In fact, biology is usually proven wrong by itself later anyway. We should stop wasting our time on pseudoscience

Modeling consciousness is the oldest problem in the book… and we’re no closer than the ancients. Don’t see any significant progress happening soon

Models are always wrong to some degree, usually replaced by something more accurate at a later time. Do you think that a model fundamentally can't exist? If so, why not?