Murtaza Hussain pfp
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
4 replies
7 recasts
27 reactions

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Lmfao Though, it is yet to be seen if he was wrong. Just because we are trying to “non liberal, non democratic nations” doesn’t mean he was wrong. Those people could be wrong in this new way. We shall see
1 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions

Murtaza Hussain pfp
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
my contrarian opinion is that he was actually right. his book was quite complex argument in reality and even if the entire world order collapsed into anarchy it wouldn't actually prove his argument wrong
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Confession: I haven’t read it. Every time I look at it it seems daunting. Read enough summaries to get the high level but I may be missing the nuances.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Murtaza Hussain pfp
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
this is a good updated look at him: https://unherd.com/2020/09/why-fukuyama-was-right-all-along/
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Thank you the share! Matches a lot of ideas from a book DWR recommended to me “Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom” by James Burnham. Though, I wonder how he feels about the cycle. Does it still end up back in liberal democracy after “restarting history”?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction