Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
I have seen this claim, but do not find it to be a convincing explanation. When Russian intelligence hacked the Clinton campaign in 2016 they gave the raw data to Wikileaks which they knew would have no compunction about publishing it in full. A foreign state and especially Iran would be very unlikely to give such data to Politico or a similar DC Beltway news outlet as they do not publish raw intel and would also be highly likely to suppress the story anyways. My assessment is that this is likely a pressure campaign to ensure that the data is not published by characterizing it as emanating from a foreign state. That is separate question from whether it is newsworthy in general but I favor transparency and would like to see it and evaluate.
7 replies
1 recast
15 reactions
Purp🇵🇸
@purp
Lol I think this is the most obvious take, It's a really good cover though
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
It’s wild the argument doesn’t remotely make sense when you think about it but it raises the temperature
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
