Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Mayur Pujara
@mayurpujara
@jessepollak Hi Jesse, I wanted to inquire if it’s possible to build on top of Base Names. I have an idea of automatic the transfer of Base Names for NFT collections and memecoins. This concept has already been implemented on Linea for collections like Efrogs and Efroglets, showcasing its viability. I believe enabling users to leave their mark on-chain via Base Names would be a valuable feature. It allows users to showcase their ownership through their Base Name without requiring others to manually verify portfolios. It would also contribute to making the chain more human-readable and user-friendly. For example: If I own #1 No-Punks, I would receive the Base Name 1.no-punks.base.eth. If the NFT is sold, the Base Name would automatically transfer to the new owner. Thread 1/2
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mayur Pujara
@mayurpujara
For memecoins, users with significant holdings could earn a whale Base Name. For instance, if I own 1% of $TYBG, I receive 🐋.1.$TYBG.base.eth. If my holdings drop below 1%, the name could revert to a general Base Name and become available for another eligible user. I believe this innovation could elevate Base NFTs and memecoins to a new level, enhancing their appeal and utility. Additionally, it has the potential to be a sustainable revenue source. The reason to incquire before building the product is there was another base name service project onchain but Base displaced it with their own ens product. Looking forward to your thoughts. I am unable to DM you here and on X 2/2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
