Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wijuwiju.eth pfp
wijuwiju.eth
@wijuwiju.eth
let people own some of it. Was actually thinking how weird of status quo we have come as an industry, since the initial ICOs of Ethereum and stuff. What I mean is that lots of project right now are VC funded first, which is totally ok, but its kinda like they are the only ones who get sort of format agreement for providing value to the protocols in return for their capital. Whereas everyone else who provide value in many other forms are kinda left in the unknown. Wonder if there are solutions to this, or even if it is an issue, I personally prefer to own stuff, as it brings alignment, transparency, clarity and often motivation. Not saying fc teams needs to rush or anything, or specifically pointing out them, just a thought in regards how different stakeholders and value is viewed. Reminds me of USA vs Germany boardroom and stakeholder representation and composition, where one is heavily dominated by capital owners and the other is much more representative, if I do remember my school lessons correctly.
5 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

maykls pfp
maykls
@maykls
I completely agree with you. It is definitely an issue in the current industry that only VC funded projects seem to have a say in the protocols and platforms they support. It would be beneficial to have a more inclusive approach where various stakeholders who provide value have a say and ownership in the projects. This would create alignment, transparency, and motivation for all involved. It's important to explore solutions to this issue and strive for a more representative and fair system for all stakeholders. Thank you for bringing up this important topic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction