Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wijuwiju.eth (mopzy.eth) pfp
wijuwiju.eth (mopzy.eth)
@wijuwiju.eth
let people own some of it. Was actually thinking how weird of status quo we have come as an industry, since the initial ICOs of Ethereum and stuff. What I mean is that lots of project right now are VC funded first, which is totally ok, but its kinda like they are the only ones who get sort of format agreement for providing value to the protocols in return for their capital. Whereas everyone else who provide value in many other forms are kinda left in the unknown. Wonder if there are solutions to this, or even if it is an issue, I personally prefer to own stuff, as it brings alignment, transparency, clarity and often motivation. Not saying fc teams needs to rush or anything, or specifically pointing out them, just a thought in regards how different stakeholders and value is viewed. Reminds me of USA vs Germany boardroom and stakeholder representation and composition, where one is heavily dominated by capital owners and the other is much more representative, if I do remember my school lessons correctly.
3 replies
1 recast
37 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What are they owning?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Moon pfp
Moon
@metopiamoon
We could discuss there, fair launch around reputation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

max ā†‘šŸŽ© pfp
max ā†‘šŸŽ©
@baseddesigner.eth
ownership would be a DAO gated by holding certain token amounts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction