Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Maxime Servais pfp
Maxime Servais
@maximeservais
Just ran a quick script to find out who left reviews and qualified. Also distributed the funds through Disperse.app on Base :) Good experiment: 31 unique people left reviews (for a total of 79 reviews)! I find it interesting that giving out free GUARANTEED $ for leaving reviews didn't yield better result than a raffle (where people basically leave reviews in the hopes of a higher payout) Thanks @linda for working on @bountycaster, very useful to reach crypto natives! ๐Ÿ™
7 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Maxime Servais pfp
Maxime Servais
@maximeservais
payments: https://basescan.org/tx/0x74c13c677136586c8372e43802787993f2ca53a339bcde3ceaf38d646fee98b8
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
That's interesting to know, thank you! The preference for guarantee or raffle really depends on the reward amounts from what I've seen (a lot of work done = preference on guarantee)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

pentacle pfp
pentacle
@pentacle
just realised we don't have you on wo - must get that sorted
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

D. Mattrenggana pfp
D. Mattrenggana
@mattrenggana
Hello sir, I think i'm doing 5 review ๐Ÿ˜
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mathieu Hardy pfp
Mathieu Hardy
@hardymathieu
Interesting indeed. Maybe: Random rewards feel like play. Guaranteed rewards feel like work. And/or random lump sum larger are more instantly useful than small drips over time. Also brain candy. Basically why "no loss lotteries" like @pooltogether work better than trying to get people to save and invest on their own (even without subsidized prize pools)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ademide ^โ _โ ^ pfp
Ademide ^โ _โ ^
@big1oot
Thank you! This is great work... Looking forward to a next time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

D. Mattrenggana pfp
D. Mattrenggana
@mattrenggana
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction