Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
Farcaster Devs: Your Feedback is Requested we published a draft spec for App Frames https://warpcast.notion.site/app-frame-spec App Frames will replace Mini Apps and provide better performance, an expanded API, and won't require allowlisting questions and comments are appreciated
24 replies
44 recasts
166 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Dont love 90%, prefer to optionally max window Is header dev managed or client managed? (Back nav etc) Does primary button replace the functionality we currently have with post messages? Or can we do both?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
> 90% vs max window our prototype uses a native modal view which is nearly full screen but allows the user to pull down to dismiss open to other configurations here (for ex I believe TG gives a few different options here like full screen, modal, bottom sheet) but this one feels like the best option to get started and KISS > header client managed, there likely needs to be an API for app frame to be able to control some aspects of it though > primary the button is an optional button that doesn't do anything but trigger a callback in the app frame code the equivalent of POST will be using requestAuthToken which will provide an App Key signed auth token scoped to your domain the advantage to this is you can send arbitrary payloads with a built in auth mechanism we'll provide some code that makes it easy to auth this token on your backend https://warpcast.notion.site/app-frame-spec#1376a6c0c10180cebfd2ebaa1f43e424
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions