Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
since apparently the "build another client, not a priority rn, doesn't drive long term growth, etc" is the default response here (despite the general sense that channels are a rushed, underexplored feature (potential new primitive) where the lack of prioritization and thoughtfulness has led to increased friction and a worse NUX) is anyone building a channel-focused client? i'm incredibly excited about the promise of channels and promise to dedicate a portion of my time, energy, and resources to exploring this with you and supporting you i am a force of nature, as some of you may know, especially when i'm motivated by both the mission and someone telling me i'm wrong
41 replies
12 recasts
169 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Currently no way to interact with channels meaningfully outside of warpcast Talks of a new api that other clients can use in the interim to add follows etc That alone will make it a lot easier for teams to rationalize having their feed embedded in their experiences imo
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
thanks for context. do you know why isn't there an API right now? or what's the rational against having an API for channels? simply prioritization?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions