Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
So fucking backwards https://decrypt.co/302023/telegram-exclusive-ton-barring-other-networks
13 replies
7 recasts
36 reactions
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
isn't this also an attempt to keep a handle on the UX tho? Most users won't have a clue what's happening under the hood and a crappy chain could make Telegram seem crap.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
That's a psyop There's a infinite rolodex of tools to ensure user safety on the chains that they just cut out Adding more wallet types would be trivial This is a "this is my playground" arbitrary chain KPI bumping extraction tactic
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
Adding wallet types might be trivial, but how do you keep a handle on cost and performance of the underlying chains, some sort of SLAs? I imagine this'll be typical of web2 meets web3 for the early years of the web2 -> web3 transition. Only when interchain web3 competition heats up will these folks be forced to open up or die...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
It's very likely this is how it will go down, as web2 companies will go into protectionist mode even if they are trying to get into web3. They will try to run their own l2s... like Sony is doing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
You're right, I think it's time to drop the 2 & the 3 It's very quickly becoming the same thing, just 50 shades of the same thing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
I guess it depends how you want to define quickly. But I can think of a few million normies that will never be capable of using a wallet or signing something, so until that part of the UX is 100% transparent dropping the 2 and the 3 seems more like fantasy land
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
