Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
df
@df
Each time I've tried to create value for the farcaster network it's made me want to lean out. Incentives for builders feel broken - some sort of ability to participate in ownership in upsides would change my incentives and make me lean in. Why do only VCs get to participate in the upside of us participating here? I'm not the only one that feels this way
8 replies
3 recasts
41 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
Not sure if now is the time, but I do think tokenizing control/ownership of the treasury and key levers like signup fee is the right move. 1. gives devs an incentive to build for the ecosystem 2. rewards users who create conversational liquidity 3. plausible deniability that merkle doesn't control a "neutral" protocol
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
df
@df
I think the argument is that this is a distraction (just grow the thing, don't create bureacratic work for yourself), but I do feel as though not aligning devs is just churning through ecosystem that could instead be leaning into growing the thing. Feels like bazaar vs cathedral, and warpcast has squarely chosen to enable only the warpcast cathedral with like a tiny cafeteria bazaar inside it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
