Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
I believe a big reason FC is not seeing more growth the last few months is due to a lack of interest and acceptance of trading and memecoins being the dominant narrative this cycle. FC's infra is best suited to be the defacto home for token projects and yet we see very very little projects doing so. I understand and appreciate the commitment to building, adoption and sustainability. I also recognize that 99% of memecoins will go to 0 by the end of this cycle. However - the current approach is making FC feel like a place that has an entirely different set of convos, most of which are not currently EV+. I say this all as someone that cares deeply about FC and it's growth but think it's important we recognize that crypto-natives on Twitter do not see value in being on here and that feels like a problem to me in the context of the next 12-24 months. It is unlikely that FC just leapfrogs crypto-native adoption and gets an influx of mainstream users without winning the wider crypto crowd over first.
10 replies
6 recasts
66 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
Strongly disagree with the implication that FC should seek approval from the crypto twitter crowd. Who cares what they think? Being the "home of memecoins" is at best hollow growth and at worst a complete turn-off to anyone outside of the tiny existing niche.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
There is no "they" IMO. There are people who use crypto, and those who don't. How do you envision FC growing to a million active users without approval from people who use crypto in the next 12-24 months? Where do you see the new influx of people not into crypto coming from?
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
